First of, we need to remember that like any government agency, immigration is bureaucratic. And a bureaucracy is well...here's a little comic from Mafalda, a comic strip from Argentina.
Riquelme's Lame Crown
Monday, October 15, 2012
Becoming an American Citizen
First of, we need to remember that like any government agency, immigration is bureaucratic. And a bureaucracy is well...here's a little comic from Mafalda, a comic strip from Argentina.
Thursday, September 13, 2012
How College Students View the World (According to Non-College People)
Some of the writing is hard to read, so here they are:
Red letters: Fascist Hell
Green letters: Great vacation to brag to everyone about :)
Blue letters: Socialist Utopia
Yellow letters: Unenlightened people who need our help :(
White Letters: Communist Utopia
Purple Letters: Buddhist Utopia
Light Blue Letters: Study abroad in same culture
In case you'd like to see other college student stereotypes go here.
http://www.cracked.com/photoplasty_357_19-things-college-students-suspect-about-real-world/
Wednesday, September 5, 2012
Death Penalty in Japan...Wait, What?
Like everyone else, I believed the fact that the U.S. was one of few countries that still had the death penalty as a means of punishment in their judicial system. A few months ago, I came across this article:
http://news.yahoo.com/japan-executes-first-prisoners-since-2010-134722700.html
My first reaction was WTF? Japan? Really? According to the article, Japan carries out executions by hanging (only two states still have hanging as an option), the condemned are kept in solitary confinement for years before their execution, and their families are informed of their deaths after the fact.
Another surprise was the overwhelming support for the death penalty in Japan, which was 85%. Only 51% of death-penalty-happy Texans support their death penalty rules!
Of course, other countries aren't too supportive of Japan's death penalty, like they don't support ours.
You learn something new every day.
More links:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/japan/9448640/Japan-condemned-over-executions.html
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20120609f1.html
http://www.texastribune.org/texas-dept-criminal-justice/death-penalty/uttt-poll-life-and-death/
Thursday, February 2, 2012
Political Parties: Can't Live w/ Them, Can't Live w/o Them
It’s always funny to see people complain and gripe about politics (political parties in general). They do have very good reasons to do so, but it’s still funny. They complain that the political party system is the reason why the American government has gone down the tubes, but they forget (or more possibly, don’t know) that political parties and their ilk have been around pretty much since the establishment of this country.
The very first political parties in existence were the Democratic-Republicans (yes, really) and Federalists, led by none other than Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, respectively. Even at the beginning of this country’s birth, people have debated and disagreed strongly on how it should be run. Jefferson and Hamilton disagreed on well, practically everything. From establishing banks (Hamilton wanted them, Jefferson didn’t), constitutional interpretation (Hamilton favored a broader interpretation while Jefferson preferred a strict interpretation), to foreign affairs (Hamilton wanted to have better ties with the British for trade purposes while Jefferson wanted to support the French in their endeavors to defeat Great Britain), they couldn’t agree on a single issue. These strong personalities clashed with one another and people flocked under them to support their views.
After Washington stepped down (he stayed neutral in all of these politics) there was debate on who would succeed him. John Adams (who was a Federalist) and Jefferson ran, with Adams winning and Jefferson assuming the vice presidency. Afterwards, when Adams ran again for presidency, Hamilton led their own party against him, paving the way for Aaron Burr to become the Federalist candidate. This isn’t too far removed from our current political system, where multiple candidates from the same party vie against each other to win the nomination (Romney-Gingrich anyone?) and people from within the party throw support for one or the other.
Mudslinging was also common back then too, surprisingly. During the French Revolution, the Federalists denounced the French revolutionaries’ actions (especially during the Reign of Terror) while the Democratic-Republicans were more sympathetic to the Revolution, especially when Britain stepped in to restore the monarchy. The Federalists then accused the Democratic-Republicans of wanting to replicate the horrors of the Revolution on American soil, and the Democratic-Republicans responded by calling them monarchists who wanted to repress the rights of the common man.
In all fairness to the founding fathers, they were men who most likely had the country's best interest in mind. The problem was that they had very different ideas on what the country's best interest was. They were very stubborn and unwilling to compromise on what they thought was right. The rivalry and bitterness, while pronounced, probably wasn't as bad as they are today since the "loser" of the presidential election would assume the office of vice president. The founding fathers probably assumed that patriotism and love for country would override rivalry and competition. This was amended later with the 12th Amendment which is why we vote for a president and vice president on the same ticket today.
Disagreeing with one another is part of human nature. Our different background, views, and personality make it so. Political parties are there to help people who have like-minded views express them better. The problem is when people forget to be courteous and polite with one another, that people are perfectly capable in "agreeing to disagree" and think that the best way to convince someone to their opinion is to declare them ignoramuses and insult everything they know and love. Somehow, that's become to be considered as the most effective way to get one's point across. Now that's really unfunny.